Showing posts with label semantic split. Show all posts
Showing posts with label semantic split. Show all posts

oblong (and a bit about ovals)

Ben Zimmer forwarded me this post from Threads, in which the writer Ruth Ware finds a transatlantic difference between AmE and BrE interpretations of oblong.

ruthwarewriter 2d Oh my god this is like "frown" all over again. Did you know the word "oblong" has different definitions in UK and US English? I've been reading descriptions wrong in US novels all this time ruthwarewriter 2d Oblongs in the US are apparently any elongated shape including ovals and ellipses. In the UK they're strictly rectangles.

(If you don't know what she means by "'frown' all over again", see this old post!)

Where oblong started

Oblong derives from Latin oblongus, meaning 'of greater length than breadth, elongated' (OED). So, you can already see that what Ware is calling the US meaning is in tune with the etymology. 

The Oxford English Dictionary's definition indicates (with 'esp.') that it has come to specifically refer to rectangles. It's a word whose meaning has narrowed with use. 

1.a.
?a1425–
Elongated (usually as a deviation from an exact square or circular form); esp. rectangular with the adjacent sides unequal.

The more particular interpretation, then, is oblong = non-square rectangle. That seems a bit redundant from my American perspective because everyone who knows the word oblong probably already knows the word rectangle, and only in geometry classes is a square a rectangle. But we'll be back at geometry class soon enough. 


Are AmE & BrE oblong really different?

Is this a transatlantic linguistic difference?  It seems so—though American dictionaries seem to show more awareness of the 'rectangle' meaning, more than UK dictionaries show about the 'elongated shape' meaning. This seems to suggest that the shift in meaning has quickly taken over in BrE and but remains incomplete in AmE. Here come a lot of dictionary entries.


The Cambridge Dictionary (a learner-orient[at]ed dictionary) is the only dictionary I've found that marks it as a US/UK difference—and a very firm one at that.


Cambridge Dictionary

Another British [learner] dictionary, Collins COBUILD, just defines the 'rectangle' meaning, as does the version of the Oxford Dictionary of English (not the same as the Oxford English Dictionary) that came with my Mac.

oblong (ɒblɒŋ IPA Pronunciation Guide, US -lɔːŋ IPA Pronunciation Guide) Word forms: oblongs countable noun [oft NOUN noun] An oblong is a shape which has two long sides and two short sides and in which all the angles are right angles. ...an oblong table.

But the two American dictionaries on the Collins dictionary site give both meanings, without marking one as British:

oblong in American English (ˈɑbˌlɔŋ) adjective Origin: ME oblonge < L oblongus, rather long < ob- (see ob-) + longus, long1 1.  longer than broad; elongated; specif., a.  rectangular and longer in one direction than in the other, esp. longer horizontally b.  elliptical noun 2.  an oblong figure Webster’s New World College Dictionary, 5th Digital Edition. Copyright © 2025 HarperCollins Publishers.      oblong in American English (ˈɑbˌlɔŋ, -ˌlɑŋ) adjective 1. elongated, usually from the square or circular form 2. in the form of a rectangle one of whose dimensions is greater than the other noun 3. an oblong figure Most material © 2005, 1997, 1991 by Penguin Random House LLC. Modified entries © 2019 by Penguin Random House LLC and HarperCollins Publishers Ltd Derived forms oblongish adjective oblongly adverb oblongness noun Word origin [1375–1425; late ME oblonge ‹ L oblongus rather long, equiv. to ob- ob- + longus long1]


And Merriam-Webster has just the older meaning:

oblong 1 of 2 adjective ob·​long ˈä-ˌblȯŋ  Synonyms of oblong  Simple Definition A Simple Definition is available from our Learner's Dictionary to help you understand the meaning faster. : deviating from a square, circular, or spherical form by elongation in one dimension an oblong piece of paper an oblong melon  see leaf illustration oblong  2 of 2 noun : something that is oblong These paintings, predominately black with vertical or horizontal bisections of white mixed with streaks of red, blue, or ochre, are reminiscent of … Mark Rothko's irradiated oblongs. —The New Yorker

So when did AmE & BrE oblong split?

The fact that the etymological meaning is the current meaning in AmE signals that this is a change that happened in the UK (or at least outside the US!) after AmE and BrE split. 

It's hard to tell from the OED examples when oblong stopped referring to non-rectangular things in BrE (if it absolutely has). Their most recent British(ish) example is from (Polish-British) Joseph Conrad in 1904, referring to a small body of water as an oblong—probably not a rectangle. Earlier examples are sometimes involve some things that are rectangular (e.g. beds), but also some things that are not rectangular, like the body of a bee (1657) or an egg (1774). 

Checking in corpora isn't entirely helpful either, since looking for the absence of a meaning is even harder than looking for a meaning. And when oblong is used, it is in reference to mirrors and tables and other things that could be any shape. The writers knew which shape they meant, but I can't know that just from the text. 

But if I had to guess (and maybe I don't have to, but I will), I'd say the restrictive meaning of oblong was spread by mathematics teaching in schools, where oblong allows square to have a nice, clear opposite. Here's a post from a maths teacher (not a math teacher) on X:


Post from 2020 on Twitter/X: I'm a big fan of the word oblong, to distinguish between types of rectangle, but we don't use it at all in secondary. It never gets a mention." Below this, is a taxonomical chart of parallelograms, with oblong and square as branches of rectangle

She was replying to someone else who'd said: "Children see the shape represented as a rectangle everywhere, yet it is actually an oblong that is part of the ‘rectangle family’."  

The word oblong might not be used in secondary school, but I've found a 2008 article by a teacher who  complains about the use of oblong in the National Numeracy Strategy (from year 4 in primary school).  He notes, however, that the word does not occur in the National Curriculum of England & Wales. I'd love to know if oblong is in particular math(s) textbooks or workbooks—and if so, when it started turning up there. (I gave up my own hunt when I discovered there's a publisher called Oblong Books.)  I'd guess that the association of oblong with 90° angles arose in the 20th century, when math(s) teaching became more 'regular' and national. Any educational historians out there with the answer? 

Meanwhile, in North America, the website of a US-based math app says: "A long, rounded rectangle is sometimes called an “oblong” shape in everyday language."  That seems to indicate that that oblong is not considered a technical term in North American geometry-teaching—and that it doesn't refer to things with 90° angles in any case.

Incidentally, this difference in meaning doesn't make much difference to how often people use the word. The News on the Web (NoW) corpus, has 0.17 oblongs per million words in American news sites, versus 0.15 on British sites. In the Corpus of Global Web-Based English (GloWbE), it's 0.34 US versus 0.33 GB. The word rectangular is a bit more common in AmE in the NoW corpus, but more common in BrE in the GloWbE corpus—so the availability of oblong for referring to rectangular things doesn't clearly affect the frequency of rectangular either.

Is it just oblongs?

Ware's mention of ovals and ellipses made me think: do I know the difference between those? The website Meaningful Math (and that lack of 's' is meaningful) says:

STUDENT-FRIENDLY DEFINITION

Oval

An oval is a curved, closed 2-D shape that may look like an egg or an ellipse.

...which is to say that for that site, as for me, an oval can be symmetrical horizontally and vertically (an ellipse) or tapered (like an egg shape). But there are plenty of other sites willing to tell you that an oval is egg-shaped, in contrast to an ellipse—and those, as far as I can see, seem to have to do with the math(s) curriculum in India. But Ware seems not to count ellipses as ovals—so does oval = egg-shape have currency in Britain? 

The Oval, the cricket ground in London, looks like neither an egg nor an ellipse!



Read more

frowns

A 2010 blog post from the Prosody Lab at McGill University was pointed in my direction last week, and judging by the reaction when I tweeted it, I'm not the only one who was surprised by the should-be-evident-but-nearly-invisible difference between British and American it reported. The post is by a non-native speaker of English, 'chael' (who I assume is Michael Wagner, the lab director) and it starts (with my added highlighting):
Three weeks ago me and a good friend were standing in front a piece of art by Jon Pylypchuck at the museum of contemporary art in Montréal. The exhibition is still on until January 4th, and I recommend checking it out.
 So looking at one of the faces, my friend asked the following question, which to me was very confusing:

“Do you think this is a frown or a moustache?”

Whatever ‘this’ was, it was clearly below the eyes, and also, the facial expression was sad–so how could it be a frown? My understanding of frown was what I later found in Webster’s online dictionary:
1 : an expression of displeasure
2 : a wrinkling of the brow in displeasure or concentration

When I expressed my puzzlement, I learned that frown, in fact, also means the opposite of smile: a downward facing mouth expressing sadness, and that this is in fact the most common/salient meaning of the word, at least to some.
The author goes on to express surprise that in 10 years in North America he hadn't learned that. But I'm 21 years outside North America and a near-lifetime owner of a Merriam-Webster dictionary (what he's cited above), so I'm even more surprised that I hadn't discovered that other people think frowns are on the forehead. For me, a frown has always meant a down-turned mouth. Sure, the rest of the face gets involved, but a frown is what a sad mouth does.

When I tweeted the question "Where is a frown?" British people told me "on the forehead". When I asked the Englishman in my house, he said the same thing. Fourteen years together and only now do I know that he's been frowning much of the time.

And like one of the blog commenters, the Brits I talked with had an epiphany: so that's why Americans say "turn your frown upside down!" to mean 'cheer up!'.

The Brits who responded to my question were mostly northwards of 50, and I do suspect that younger, emoji-centric Britons may have a different perspective, knowing that the above emoji is called 'slightly frowning face' and having been exposed to the upside-down rhyme for more of their lives. (I am tempted to wake up the 8-year-old and ask her.)


I'm fairly surprised that Merriam-Webster does not have the downward-turning mouth definition of frown—the newer meaning. Neither do most of the dictionaries I consulted—only online-only types seem to have it. While the mouth sense is newer, many northwards-of-50 Americans like me just take that meaning for granted. I mean, I'm pretty sure learned it from my mother.

On the Murphy side of my family, we are genetically predisposed to sticking our tongues out in concentration, though I suppose there's some brow-furrowing too. We just call it a furrowed brow rather than a frown. When we're annoyed we might glower.  All of these should be available in British English too—I'm just mentioning them to point out that not having this meaning of frown does not prevent us from talking about the facial expression.

A continuing AmE/BrE divide on this matter is supported by the nominal collocates of frown—fancy linguist-speak for which nouns go near (±3 words in this case) frown in the Corpus of Global Web-Based English.


The green-highlighted words are the "most American" (left) and "most British" (right) collocates of frown. There's all sorts of stuff there, but most relevant to us, the American column has lips and smile (also eyes, it must be said) and the British column has concentration and forehead. (Though it must also be said, the actual numbers of these collocates are tiny.)

I recommend having a look at the McGill blog post. They've done a little digging to try to find the earliest instances of frown as a mouth-move, which seem to be from the mid-20th century.

Meanwhile, I can't seem to find an emoji that gives the essence of the BrE frown. Is it persevering face? 😣 Is it pensive face? 😔 There doesn't seem to be a 'concentration' face. Quick! Someone! Alert the Unicode Consortium!

Postscript, 13 Sept 2016:
I have to add a link to Josef Fruehwald's tweet—click on the links to see American Sign Language and British Sign Language translations of English frown. Quite a stark difference!


Read more

The book!

View by topic

Abbr.

AmE = American English
BrE = British English
OED = Oxford English Dictionary (online)