Separated by a Common Language

 Neil W. wrote to ask:

I am seeing lots of advertisements for a new film called "The Invite". (Sounds quite promising with Seth Rogen playing his usual character). 

Here is a review from the notoriously picky Peter Bradshaw, who quite liked it.  Within this article he uses the phrase "extend the invitation of the title". 

So my question: is it an Americanism to use "invite" as a noun? I (Scottish) would certainly only use "the invitation". Or is some subtle difference (invite is by mouth, invitation more formal on paper) being implied?

Of course it might be one of those old UK usages that went to America and stayed.

Thanks for the question, Neil. And I'm even going to try to be topical and answer it while the film is still in (more BrE) cinemas/(AmE) theaters (in the UK, at least). 

The Oxford English Dictionary has included the noun invite since its first publication (1900 for this bit of the alphabet), marking it as colloquial and tracing it back as far as 1659: "Bishop Cranmer..gives him an earnest invite to England." They have quite a few 19th-century examples and a couple from 1968 and 1970—all British, as far as I can tell. 

But invite (n.) seems to have really taken off even later than that. Here it is in Google Books since 1950 (searching any earlier gives us nothing remarkable). The blue line shows an increase in use, starting in the 1980s and shooting up in the present century:

And here are the numbers in 2012–13 in the Corpus of Global Web-Based English. The darker blue on GB/IE indicates that it's slightly a more British/Irish thing to say.

    invitation noun

    invite verb; so you do not send someone an “invite”

So Peter Bradshaw was following his guide in using a synonym for the film's title. 

I perceive invite as used more for the physical invitation (e.g. a printed wedding invitation) than the speech act it communicates (i.e., the intention to invite). To test this, I tried searching for the invit* with (more AmE) a bunch of different verbs in GloWbE. Many of the verbs had too-tiny numbers to bother putting in this table (e.g. e-mail, distribute, order, select). (There weren't really enough to mention for deliver, but I had six rows in my table, so I stuck it in anyway.) 

(via r/soccer, Reddit 2017)

I.2.b.

1863–

Chiefly British. The game governed by the rules of the Football Association and played with a round ball between two teams of eleven players on a rectangular field having goalposts at either end, the object being to score the most goals by kicking or heading the ball into the opposing team's goal. Cf. soccer n.

With the exception of Ireland (see note at I.2e), the usual term in most of the rest of the English-speaking world is soccer. In New Zealand and South Africa use of both football and soccer is common.

1. 1863

   Football.—A meeting of the Captains of Clubs has been held at Freemasons' Tavern for promoting the adoption of a general code of rules.

   Essex Standard 4 November
   
2. 1890

   A game of football, under the Association rules, was played on the Cooperage ground yesterday afternoon.

   Times of India 10 October 3/2
   
3. 1927

   The principal games for inter-school contests are football in the autumn and winter and cricket in the spring and summer.

   H. J. Savage, Games & Sports in Brit. Schools & Universities iii. 56
   
4. 1995

   The popularity of football eventually developed a momentum of its own.

   T. Mason, Passion of People? viii. 120
   
5. 2014

   It is possible to quibble whether the sport should be referred to in Australia as football or soccer—the latter to differentiate it from Australian football.

   Age (Melbourne) (Nexis) 13 August 63
   

Originally colloquial.

1. 1885–

   The game of football as played under the rules of the Football Association; cf. football n. I.2b.

   Recorded earliest in soccer game n.

   Football is the more usual term in Britain and Ireland, except in cases where it is necessary to distinguish soccer from other forms of football.

   1. 1885

      This was pre-eminently the most important ‘Socker’ game played in Oxford this term.

      Oldhallian December 171
      
   2. 1890

      Were he to be asked what was his most pleasant recollection of Oxford life, [the average man] would reply, if he belonged to the later development, ‘footer’, or ‘socker’, or ‘the togger’.

      Longman's Magazine July 325
      
   3. 1894

      The rival attractions of ‘rugger’ and ‘socker’.

      Westminster Gazette 11 January 7/1
      
   4. 1924

      However any sane person could prefer soccer to cricket the good little Horace totally failed to comprehend.

      H. de Sélincourt, Cricket Match iv. 83
      
   5. 1935

      No one more thoroughly qualified to write the history of ‘soccer’..can be imagined.

      Punch 24 April 476/2
      
   6. 1971

      All you need to play soccer is a ball, a field and players.

      L. Koppett, New York Times Guide to Spectator Sports xii. 193
      
   7. 2001

      A game of soccer in the snow with both sexes and several generations joining in.

      Observer 15 July (Review section) 9/5
      
2. 
   

Why have two different words for the same definition? The why of the divide is found in another side of historical context: social class in England. 

As mentioned in the OED definition, English sporting communities in the late 1800s coined soccer. In particular, this was specific to university students from the upper classes (such as those attending Oxford) who played under the new “Association Football” rules. 

A June 2026 BBC article notes that that wealthy students at the time had “a habit of shortening words and adding ‘-er’ to the end” to make slang terms. For example: breakfast becomes brekker, rugby became rugger. The soc in soccer comes from association in association football plus that -er suffix. On his blog Scottish Sport History, sports historian Andy Mitchell states that soccer and rugger were coined at the same time. The Britannica encyclop(a)edia site claims that students first contracted association football down to assoccer or asoccer before finally reaching soccer or socker.  [Ed: see Ben Zimmer's further research in comments below, though!]

Over time, preferences for the two terms for the sport have changed, especially in the UK.  I used Google Ngram Viewer to analy{s/z}e the various names for soccer/football in British English books to see if they have died out or maintained popularity. The spelling of assoccer gave no results. We can also see that football is the more popular option to refer to the game, with soccer not growing as much since its first use. (Football, of course, can refer to other games as well, but in BrE it most usually refers to soccer.)

The word soccer also left the UK, becoming popular in other countries, including the US. Referring back to our introductory map, these soccer-saying nations include Australia and South Africa. This curious use of soccer in these anglophone countries may be because of the prior existence of other sports called football in those places. North America, notably, has its first intercollegiate "foot-ball" game (using rugby-like rules) in November 1869, sixteen years before the word soccer came to be. This game was an intercollegiate competition between Princeton and Rutgers universities. 

But this version of football does not match the type that was (and is to this day) played in the UK. American football allows the ball to be held while/whilst running with it and full-body tackling to gain possession. None of this is allowed in its British English counterpart without at least a red card or match suspension! The games are even scored differently.

For Brits to understand what Americans (or Australians or South Africans) mean by football, we need something extra. I know this myself as a born-and-bred Brit. If someone were to talk to me about the US version of football, they would have to specify which kind they were talking about with some form of pre-modification. This usually means adding a noun to further describe the meaning. For the US game, this would be American before football so that I do not assume they’re talking about the UK version, which comes as a given to me. 

A Word Sketch from the Sketch Engine tool shows words that pre-modify the word football in the British National Corpus. The top five words include Gaelic and rugby, which distinguish non-soccer kinds of football from the usual BrE meaning of football. (Ed: League might occur in phrases like Premier League football, i.e. soccer, or in Rugby League football, i.e. not-soccer.)

This kind of pre-modification is more particular to British English than American English because American English has soccer to help distinguish, whereas British English requires the American before football to be able to communicate the difference between the two. This also works out in the UK for Gaelic football, which, similar to the US version, comes with its own set of distinguishable rules from the BrE football. 

So, blowing the final whistle on the deliberation between soccer and football, both are equally as valid as one another as description of “the beautiful game”, dependent on which nation you are in. In the US, if the ball cannot be held, its soccer only, and if it can be, it is football. In the UK, football is king; if the ball is held, you’re referencing American football or another sport entirely: rugby. 

Related posts

Name-clipping (2006): see the comments for more on social class 

World Cup words (2006)

fixtures and brackets (2022)

Up the Albion! (2007)